Web application review
Authentication, access control, input handling, session and data exposure checked against the OWASP Top 10.
Security & audits
Practical security reviews of web apps, APIs, WordPress sites and smart contracts — with findings ranked by real risk and help implementing the fixes, not just a PDF.
OWASPAPI securityWordPress hardeningSmart-contract reviewPen-test prep
Overview
Most breaches are not clever. They come from a forgotten admin account, an outdated plugin, an API that returns another customer’s data when an ID is changed, or a contract function nobody thought to restrict. A focused review finds these before an attacker, a customer or a regulator does.
We combine automated scanning with manual testing and code review, concentrating on what an attacker would go after first: authentication, permissions, payments and personal data. Findings are ranked by real-world risk and written so both developers and decision-makers understand them.
Then we help fix them. Because we build in the same stacks we review — WordPress, Laravel, PHP, Python and Solidity — we can implement the changes with your team rather than leaving you with a list.
What we deliver
Authentication, access control, input handling, session and data exposure checked against the OWASP Top 10.
Object-level authorisation, rate limits, token handling and data leakage checked against the OWASP API Security Top 10.
Plugin and theme risks, user roles, file permissions, login protection, backups and monitoring on your live site.
Manual review of Solidity code for reentrancy, access control, oracle, signature and arithmetic issues.
Server exposure, TLS, firewall rules, secret storage and who can access what.
Plain-English findings ranked by risk, with a fix plan — and our help implementing it if you want it.
Signs you need this
Tech stack
Automated scanning finds the obvious; manual review finds what attackers would use.
OWASP Top 10OWASP API Security Top 10OWASP ASVSCIS benchmarks
Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPDependency scanningManual review
WPScanWordfenceFile-integrity checks
SlitherFoundryFuzz testingManual review
How we work
What is being reviewed, which environments, what is off limits and how we will communicate urgent findings.
Automated scanning plus manual testing and code review, focused on the areas with most at stake.
Findings with severity, evidence and clear fixes, plus a short summary for non-technical leaders.
We help your team implement fixes — or implement them ourselves — in order of risk.
A re-test of fixed issues and advice on keeping security healthy as the product changes.
Ways to work
Clearly defined deliverables at a fixed price — ideal for websites, audits and well-understood builds.
See packages →For bespoke products and platforms: a short discovery, then a written proposal with milestones and a fixed or capped price.
Request a quote →Ongoing support, maintenance and improvement with a guaranteed response time and a set number of hours each month.
Discuss a retainer →Flexible time-and-materials help for troubleshooting, code reviews, consulting and team augmentation.
Book time →Questions
Can’t see your question? Ask us directly — you’ll get a straight, practical answer, even if it’s “you don’t need us for this”.
Our reviews combine testing and code review, and are ideal before launch or before a formal third-party penetration test. If you need an independent certified pen-test for compliance, we help you prepare for it and fix what it finds.
Only with written permission and an agreed scope. We prefer testing a staging copy for anything that could affect data or availability, and we tell you immediately if we find something critical.
A short executive summary, then each finding with severity, how we found it, why it is important and exactly how to fix it. No padding with low-value scanner output.
Yes. Many clients ask us to implement the fixes, especially for WordPress, Laravel, PHP and Python applications. Security reviews that end with a report nobody acts on do not make anyone safer.
We access only what is needed, use test accounts where possible, never copy real personal data off your systems, and delete any working files after the engagement. We are happy to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
A review supports compliance but is not the same thing. The Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and regulations like GDPR expect appropriate technical measures; our work helps you show them. Your data-protection lead or adviser should confirm what applies to you.
Before major launches, after big changes to authentication or payments, and at least yearly for systems handling sensitive data — plus continuous dependency updates in between.
Tell us what you’re building, or what’s broken. We’ll come back with questions, a suggested approach and the simplest sensible next step — no obligation.